Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Tak Khunn Wang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Wang analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Tak Khunn Wang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carabelli 1 - 0 Wang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 48.68% of points on their second serve, while Wang has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 55.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wang has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 60.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wang has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 67.12% of matches played (W/L 49/ 24), with Wang winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 287/ 159), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 75/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 47/ 58).
- Player level: In the last year, Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.14% of matches (W/L 43/ 15), where as Wang has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carabelli winning 1 times and Wang being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 2 and Wang winning 0. The last match between Carabelli and Wang was at the Salinas Challenger, 21-04-2021, Second, Hard with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carabelli and Wang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Carabelli winning 0 times and Wang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Carabelli winning 0, and Wang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.96 while Wang has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wang has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 46.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wang has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
10
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
110
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
859
Rank
265
High
32
Age
R
Plays
10
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
10
Minor
Form
63% (316-184)
Career Total W/L
58% (337-244)
66% (27-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$130,440
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Tak Khunn Wang |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:8:17 | 1:8:17 |
1st Serve % | 63% (26/41) | 53% (20/38) |
1st Serve Win% | 77% (20/26) | 30% (6/20) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 33% (6/18) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 20% (1/5) |
Return Points W% | 68% (26/38) | 32% (13/41) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Tak Khunn Wang |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 66% (27/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (56/37) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (493/425) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 66% (25/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0 |
Aces Total | 95 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
DFs Total | 85 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 237.41 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (1864/2965) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (1257/1864) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (536/1101) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 47% (150/321) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (1264/2994) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 78% (21/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (25/39) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 22% (18/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Tak Khunn Wang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
15
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Baptiste Crepatte
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Yannick Mertens
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-0 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maxence Broville
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Louis Wessels
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
115)
22
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
115)
120
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Matt Ponchet
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Leopold Zima
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Antoine Bellier
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
17
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mick Veldheer
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 4-3 ret. | H2H |
view more